February 4, 2012

Fall Real Estate Roundtable 2010

In a lively e-mail exchange, our experts reassess the Toronto real estate market

 

POST: When we met in the spring, you experts were optimistic about the future of Toronto real estate, and rightly so: the market soared through April, May and June. But July saw a major drop-off, with only 6,564 homes sold compared to 9,967 the previous July. So what’s happening? Is this just a seasonal trend, or is something more precipitous ahead?

Garth Turner: You say that the experts were “optimistic” about the future of Toronto real estate at the last chinwag. Not so fast, editor! I was decidedly grumpy at the event, forecasting that the second half of the year would see a substantial correction,with the possibility of a multi-year price melt after that, reminiscent of what has hit many U.S.cities.

And I was right.

Sales have declined now for a string of months, and prices have begun their descent. Listings swelled and have now contracted — and this all adheres to a classic pattern of spent markets. My only surprise is that anyone should be surprised. Give it up, expert dudes. You choked.

Sherry Cooper: Toronto’s housing market is merely cooling down. Home prices are just off recent record highs — some correction. Home sales are returning to more normal levels after hitting record highs around the turn of the year. Listings have gone up but not terribly so. The market is becoming better balanced.

Turner: Sherry, you’d have made a damn fine realtor. “Balanced” is the industry’s favourite word. I think David Lereah used that description in 2006 when he told Americans the market was correcting normally, home sales were returning to pre-boom levels and there was no cause for concern. Five years later the U.S. middle class is gutted ... Surely you do not want a statement like the one you just made to go on your record? Just askin’.

Cooper: Garth, surely you aren’t comparing the housing situation in the U.S.to Canada. Since when did our mortgage lenders make loans to people with no income, no assets, no money down and no documentation?

Harry Stinson: While it has not been my historic behaviour pattern to agree with bankers, I would tend to agree with Sherry on this perspective.

Many of Garth’s points are valid, but overall I think that real estate, particularly in Canada, remains one of the more comforting places to invest.

Cooper: Our bank and all of the others qualify people based on interest rate levels that are significantly higher than current “teaser” levels. It is, however, true that a small proportion of homeowners with recent mortgages might be in over their heads if they lose their job or interest rates rise sharply, but there is a very low loan-to-value ratio in Canada.

Stinson: Even if Garth’s “facts”are correct, if there is one thing that Canadians are passionate about, it is their complete discomfort with passionate behaviour. You can yell “fire” in a crowded Canadian theatre and the audience will respectfully shuffle out in an orderly manner or possibly even wait for an official-looking person to issue instructions. I certainly recall the early ’90s slowdown (when Brad and I worked together selling condos). Indeed the market slowed down and prices did recede, and many people were disappointed that hoped-for riches did not materialize, but there was no sense of serious panic. Most people simply resigned themselves to holding on … And life went on.

Elli Davis: Perhaps I am not the “normal” realtor in the central core of Toronto, but I have experienced an excellent June and July and have several new listings in August.

They are selling at about two per week and I am far ahead of 2009 sales figures.

The HST impact was nil, as far as my business is concerned, and I feel that the “slowdown” is based on seasonal rather than economic factors.

Cooper: The recent clear signs of slowing in Toronto (and Canada) housing markets were in fact widely predicted by almost every mainstream economist out there through the spring (based on the tighter mortgage rules, the HST and higher rates). We saw a classic pulling forward of activity from the second half into the first half of the year, so just as the underlying market strength was exaggerated by the huge sales gains in the first half of 2010, the weakness is now being exaggerated by sharp sales drops from a year ago.

Turner: I appreciate Sherry’s attempted recovery, especially the part about “almost every mainstream economist out there” predicting a real estate correction long ago. In fact in this very magazine in March, when I was warning of a convergence of negatives for real estate, Sherry boldly said: “Frankly, I believe that Canada is going to be a real magnet for money. The money’s going to come in to stocks and bonds,but it’s going to come in to real estate,and it’s serious money. And we are seeing it already.” That sure doesn’t sound like a note of caution to me, and you are the quintessential mainstream economist ... At least you are backpedalling now. That’s something.

Stinson: Well, Garth, I think you can cross BMO off your list of possible financing sources, should you ever need any.

Davis: This year has been much healthier than last year, and the listing inventory is low in certain pockets and certain buildings. The listings that are still on the market after 30 days need a price reduction and that is the best prescription for a sale. Toronto has always been price sensitive, and if the seller is truly interested in selling and will listen to educated advice, success will follow. The slowdown in sales in the carriage trade is more seasonal than economic.

Stinson: I totally agree. The general level of motivation is pretty slack during this season. There are far fewer clients looking around, and vendors are not taking the sales process as seriously

Turner: I admire people like Elli, and it’s obvious what the foundation of her success is. However, the economy is not eternal, and it seems clear we’re in a period of deflationary angst. Those with wealth may be more insulated than the average household, but real estate is a fairly integrated commodity, and the journey from Etobicoke to Leaside to Lawrence Park is dependent upon rising incomes and accumulated wealth. That chain is being broken by this economy. I would pay it heed, even when toiling on the carriage trade.

Brad Lamb: As usual, Garth chooses the end of the world scenario, which is right only once ... You really need to listen to what consumers of all levels of real estate are saying. We are seeing the market ease off the accelerator after getting ahead of itself.

The HST is causing prices to rise this year by a few percentage points. While resale volume is down from highs, it shows that there is tremendous liquidity in the market with a mid-6,000 unit volume and 33 days as the time to sell.

Sixty-six hundred July sales would normally indicate an 85,000 sale year, which is a strong annual number ... All in all, the market is fine and will continue to chug along without any real incident. Garth, I think you’re wrong here; however, sometime in the future, I am sure we will see a real estate correction in Toronto. It is unlikely that will be any time soon.

Elise Kalles: We are still optimistic in the market. An 85,000 sale year is definitely a strong year.I agree with Elli: we’re still experiencing bidding wars this summer, and if there is a slowdown, it’s seasonal, not economic. The summer is slow historically, and the attendance to open houses for new properties has diminished to less than half. My only worry is that buyers read Garth’s predictions!

Comments to the Post City Magazines website do not reflect the opinions of the company or the author of the article in question. We do not edit comments for grammar, length or clarity. Offensive comments will be removed at the discretion of Post City Magazines. To read all of our website policies, click here.

Reader Comments:
Old to new | New to old
Sep 2, 2010 06:24 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Surely none of these so called experts are stupid enough to believe their own rhetoric?

"The HST is causing prices to rise this year by a few percentage points."

The HST doesn't even apply to the re-sale home market, and even if you think that BC and Ont. buyers are confused about it, how does that explain the rise and cooling of the markets in provinces (like Alberta) that don't even have the HST?

When you get together the VP of Harvey Kalles Real Estate, a Developer, and the President of top selling condo firm I don't think you should take their opinions without a grain of salt.

Sep 2, 2010 08:29 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Garth Turner is the only credible person on this panel. The rest are real estate schills.

Sep 2, 2010 11:49 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

What would you expect people to say who make their money from the sale of real estate? Thanks for having someone who is actually talking about the real issues that drive an economy and thus real estate...Garth. Prices always go up...right! It's always a good time to buy.

Sep 3, 2010 10:04 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

"Even if Garth’s “facts”are correct, if there is one thing that Canadians are passionate about, it is their complete discomfort with passionate behaviour. You can yell “fire” in a crowded Canadian theatre and the audience will respectfully shuffle out in an orderly manner or possibly even wait for an official-looking person to issue instructions. I certainly recall the early ’90s slowdown (when Brad and I worked together selling condos). Indeed the market slowed down and prices did recede, and many people were disappointed that hoped-for riches did not materialize, but there was no sense of serious panic. Most people simply resigned themselves to holding on … And life went on."

Winner!

Sep 3, 2010 04:19 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Well, isn't that appropriate. Ms. Kalles found a way to try to spin the blame for the impending crash in her 'last word' performance. Good luck with that reach.

Stick to the facts Elise. Garth has nothing to do with them. Try following some red dots (to the innocent victims you just tried to influence: I'm referring to the MLS site) over breakfast for the next few months, pardon me, years. You could also watch the actual list prices as they decline simultaneously. The red dot nightmare has been occurring across the country for months now and is really starting to pick up the pace, ie. more frightening every day, more tragic stories of a lack of buyers and price reductions every day. Coast..........to............coast. But you must know this Elise. You're on the site every day as an agent. Even if you have an insulated client roster the dots are unavoidable every time you hit "enter".

Harry : You were extremely careful, I'll give you that.

To the rest of you, your behaviour is shameful as well. As for defending our lending practices, please. 5% down over 35-40 years would never have happened a few years ago. A CMHC insured mortgage wouldn't be allowed higher than a 75% LTV. (that means a minimum of 25% down for those who don't know). Even a private broker wouldn't exceed 80% back then. The fact that CMHC changed the rules to this (idiotic) degree makes it seem like this aspect of the crash coming (and it will be multi-faceted folks thanks to the pumping these folks and their cohorts have done) was imminent all along.

And so sorry, I don't believe that you are not aware of the mortgages granted in this country that allowed a borrower to avoid proving his or her income, ie. "self-employed" mortgages, which are still rampant today. Canada has been involved in sub-prime mortgage lending for a very long time. 5% down is a version of that and it only gets worse from there.

To Garth, thankfully you exist and have the guts to take them on. Facts alone don't cut it for these "professionals". After all, we are talking about their daily bread. Fortunately for them, when the economy snowballs as a result of the impending crash, which will cause a domino effect in the retail sector, the trades, and subsequent job loss in both, they won't have to worry about where that bread is coming from. Only the ones who believed them, and were allowed to purchase something beyond their means will. If not now, then when their mortgages reset at much higher rates, or, when they lose their jobs during the crash that greed built. Just....like....the....U..S. A different catalyst, but the same result.

Sep 4, 2010 12:47 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Regarding Harry's comments: "I certainly recall the early ’90s slowdown (when Brad and I worked together selling condos). Indeed the market slowed down and prices did recede, and many people were disappointed that hoped-for riches did not materialize, but there was no sense of serious panic. Most people simply resigned themselves to holding on … And life went on."

Where should I start? Firstly, "most people", meaning the "most of the ones" who had the option of continuing to make their mortgage payments, did, yes. Even with a "negative equity" situation on their hands.

However, this comment of Harry's neglects to mention the fact that thousands of homes were lost due to job loss, therefore causing the negative equity situations among the communities, from large cities to smaller towns. Residential lost appx 25% of value and small/mid commercial lost appx 50%. It was a very, very bad real estate crash. I was involved, and I am not an agent. It was certainly not a "slow down", it was a disaster. All of the major banks had to restructure because of the magnitude of the losses in Real Estate. I was part of that. You ALL remember these facts, don't deny it. Spin all you want, but facts don't lie. That goes for the 90's, and it also applies to what your industries have been doing to the people of Canada for a couple of years. Oh, and the size of this bubble (market value vs affordability) as you all know, makes the one back then look like a cake walk.

This crash is going to be worse. There are many more factors involved in this one. There is no way all on this panel except Garth are oblivious regarding the indicators and the already occurring facts. Sherry, you either have no conscience or no intellect. Either way, it's not good and when I think of your salary and bonuses I feel very disheartened.

One more thought - the MSM (main stream media) can't keep the real job loss figures as of late out of the media much longer either. They've finally had to start trickling out the truth to the "herd" about the real estate (however little they are bothering to eek out thus far) and soon they will have to tell the truth about the retail sectors and the job losses (that have already happened). Here's to the spin about job creation coming to an end. People deserve the facts, and then to be able to understand what they mean.

Sep 4, 2010 01:12 am
 Posted by  Anonymous

Garth has been wrong for years. What else is new.

Sep 4, 2010 04:27 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

Garth has been making a living being wrong about real estate. He failed at politics and now he's failing at economics.

He writes up mythical contrarian views and binds them into a book that is bought by renters who are envious of the real estate boom.

Good job catering to the sheeple who have missed out Garth!

Oh, did I mention that Garth has been horribly wrong since his first book? No worry. He won't go hungry because he's been eating crow for years.

I sense another bestseller around the corner!

Sep 5, 2010 04:36 pm
 Posted by  Anonymous

I'm not sure why everybody is so down on real estate. This past August my wife and I listed our GTA condo for a little over $500 p sq ft and it sold in a couple weeks. Anecdotally it was pretty easy. Perhaps some sellers are asking for too much so their properties aren't moving.

Add your comment:
Verification Question. (This is so we know you are a human and not a spam robot.)

What is 7 + 9 ?